Unfamiliar Money? Truly?

 Unfamiliar Money? Truly?


Frantic Democrats Make Wild Claims About Why They’re Losing


From public Democrat faction boards to the president himself, the nonconformists in the U.S. are making wild cases that their resistance from the GOP is being subsidized by “secret unfamiliar cash.” The U.S. Office of Commerce health insurance in China for foreigners has been involved… also the influencers inside the party even concede there is positively no confirmation of these allegations. One unmistakable Democrat, when asked on a public news program what verification his party had that unfamiliar cash was controlling the impending decisions, could just answer by asking the journalist “Indeed, do you have any confirmation it isn’t correct?”




In the first place, this is ludicrous filthy governmental issues obviously, brought to you by the party that guaranteed two years prior to end such hardliner hogwash. A ton of senseless stuff gets impacted onto the wireless transmissions during political decision years (particularly during what I call “The Stupid Season”), however this crosses another line. The Democrat coalition has presumably even left itself defenseless against claims by those it has blamed without verification.


Second, is there any such thing as “unfamiliar cash” any longer? Of course, it is illicit for unfamiliar interests to take part in the U.S. electing process, however it’s shortsighted to portray “shadowy back-room bargains financed by unfamiliar cash.” Since the 1960s, when the most noticeably awful thing that could happen would be an atomic conflict (this was in constantly… look at it), the world’s most extravagant nations have met up to firmly interface every one of the world’s economies together with the end goal that assuming any significant economy goes down, so do they all. This is known as the convention of “Commonly Assured Economic Destruction,” intended to supplant the old “Commonly Assured Destruction” tenet of the virus war. Presently we don’t need to battle wars that kill individuals (current conflicts notwithstanding)… we can battle each other with cash. Be that as it may, the MAED strategy guarantees no far off country (in any event, including China, whose cash was highlighted in the erroneous promotion being referred to) serves its own wellbeing by attempting to destroy our economy. China relies upon us, essentially however much we rely on China. (The plan makes a worldwide intrigue against abundance, however, so it’s actually savvy in these occasions to get as much training regarding the matter as possible, and to ponder alleviating systems like setting aside cash, paying off past commitments, and beginning a business as an afterthought.)


At last… why on earth would the Democrats grumble about unfamiliar cash? Their political moves have for some time been helped by affluent outsiders from George Soros to the Clintons’ Chinese supporters. However, more significantly, wasn’t the appointment of Barack Obama expected to reestablish America’s overall standing from the terrible disintegration it experienced under (pant!) George W. Hedge? On account of Obama, isn’t the remainder of the world expected to adore us now?


Leave a Comment